1. Transfer petition — Family Court proceedings — Minor child. (Para 2 , 3 )
Back
Next 
1999 Supreme(SC) 199
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.B.Majmudar : V.N.Khare
Usha George
Versus
Koshy George
Case No. : 872 of 1998
A transfer of legal proceedings is generally not granted if the case is already significantly advanced in the current court, to ensure the timely conclusion of the matter.
Headnote:(A) Transfer of Proceedings - Family Court - Stage of proceedings - Where the court is already seized of the matter for a significant period and multiple sittings have been conducted, it is not the appropriate stage to transfer the proceedings to another court. (Para 2)
Facts of the case:
A petition was filed seeking the transfer of proceedings from one Family Court to another. The proceedings in the current court had been ongoing for a considerable time, with eleven sittings already completed. The matter involved a minor child.
Findings of Court:
The court directed the current Family Court to conclude the proceedings as early as possible, preferably within three months. The presence of the minor child was dispensed with, subject to the court's discretion, and the respondent father was permitted to meet the minor son after notifying the petitioner.
Issues: Whether the proceedings should be transferred from the current Family Court to another court given the advanced stage of the litigation.
Ratio Decidendi: Transfer of proceedings is not warranted when the matter is already significantly advanced in the existing court, as it would hinder the timely conclusion of the case.
Result: Transfer petition disposed of.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Request for transfer of proceedings from one Family Court to another. (Para 2 )
3. Transfer is improper when the court has been seized of the matter for a long period and multiple sittings have occurred. (Para 2 )
4. Proceedings should not be transferred at a late stage if the current court has already conducted substantial hearings. (Para 2 )
5. Transfer petition disposed of — proceedings to be concluded within three months — child's presence dispensed with — visitation permitted. (Para 2 , 3 )
6. When is it improper to transfer proceedings from one court to another?
Transfer is improper when the court has been seized of the matter for a significant period and multiple sittings have already been conducted. (Para 2 )
7. May a court dispense with the presence of a minor child in family proceedings?
Yes, the court may dispense with the presence of a minor child, subject to further orders if the court later deems such presence necessary. (Para 2 )
8. Can visitation rights be granted while proceedings are pending?
Yes, the court may permit a parent to meet their minor child upon providing due intimation to the other party. (Para 3 )
(1) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties.
(2) IN view of the fact that the Family Court at Secunderabad is already seized of the matter since long and we are told that 11 sittings are over, in our view, this is not the proper stage to transfer the proceedings from the Family Court, Secunderabad to any other court. However, we direct the Family Court at Secunderabad to see that the proceedings are put to an end at the earliest and preferably within three months from today. In the meantime the presence of the minor child at Secunderabad is dispensed with subject to any further orders of the Family Court if the Court feels his presence necessary.
(3) IT is also made clear that the respondent father will be permitted to meet his minor son at Chennai after due intimation to the petitioner. The transfer petition is disposed of accordingly.
