1. Writ petition dismissed due to erroneous grouping with other matters — Special Leave Petition filed against the dismissal. (Para 1 )
Back
Next 
1994 Supreme(SC) 304
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.B.Sawant : R.M.Sahai : S.Mohan
Chetan Metal Supply Corporation
Versus
Union Of India
Case No. : 4841 of 1994
Date of Decision : 3/1/94
When a writ petition is erroneously dismissed due to incorrect grouping with other matters, the appropriate remedy is to seek a review from the High Court, and any resulting delay should be condoned.
Headnote:(A) Civil Procedure - Review - Writ Petition - Petition wrongly grouped with other matters and dismissed - Appropriate remedy is to approach the High Court for review pointing out the error - Delay in filing review to be condoned by the High Court. (Paras 1, 2)
Facts of the case:
A writ petition was erroneously placed on board with a group of petitions involving similar issues decided by a Full Bench of the High Court, resulting in its dismissal. The petitioner subsequently filed a special leave petition before the Supreme Court.
Findings of Court:
The petitioner should have approached the High Court by way of review to point out the error in the grouping of the petitions that led to the dismissal.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be directed to seek a review from the High Court after a writ petition was wrongly dismissed due to incorrect grouping.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a petition is dismissed due to a procedural error in grouping it with other matters, the proper legal recourse is to seek a review from the court that passed the order, and the court should condone any delay associated with such a request.
Result: SLP disposed of; petitioner directed to approach the High Court in review.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Petitioner contended that the writ petition was wrongly placed on board with a group of petitions and dismissed erroneously. (Para 1 )
3. The petitioner should have approached the High Court for review to rectify the erroneous dismissal resulting from the wrong grouping of petitions. (Para 1 )
4. An erroneous dismissal of a petition due to administrative grouping errors should be addressed through a review petition in the High Court. (Para 1 )
5. Petitioner directed to seek review from the High Court, with directions to condone delay; SLP disposed of. (Para 2 )
6. What is the appropriate remedy when a writ petition is dismissed due to an administrative error in grouping?
The petitioner should approach the High Court by way of a review petition to point out the error and seek rectification. (Para 1 )
7. Can the court direct a lower court to condone delay in filing a review petition?
Yes, the court can direct the High Court to condone delay when the petitioner is directed to seek a review to correct an administrative error. (Para 2 )
(1) DELAY condoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that his Writ Petition No. 3159 of 1987 was wrongly placed on board along with another group of petitions where the issue involved was similar to the one which was decided by the Full Bench of the High Court in Bombay Conductors and Electricals Ltd. v. Govt. of India1. Along with the said group of matters, his writ petition was also dismissed. Therefore he had to come to this Court by way of the present special leave petition. The petitioner should have approached the High Court by way of review pointing out the said order.
(2) WE, therefore, direct the petitioner to approach the High Court in review. If there is any delay the High Court will condone it. The SLP is disposed of accordingly.
