SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 290

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.T.THOMAS
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
K. Allabakash – Respondent


K.T.THOMAS, J.

(1) THE respondent, a Sub-Inspector of Police was convicted of the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for causing the death of a prisoner in the police station. The High Court, on an appeal filed by the respondent, acquitted him for want of evidence. All material witnesses for proving the prosecution case have turned hostile, including PW 1, the son of the deceased. After hearing learned counsel for the State and perusing the relevant documents we are of the view that the High Court has come to the correct conclusion that prosecution has failed to prove the case against the respondent.

(2) HOWEVER, we make it clear that acquittal of the respondent shall not be construed as a clear exoneration of the respondent, for the allegations call for departmental proceedings, if not already initiated, against him.

(3) WITH the said observations we dispose of this appeal.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top