SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1318

A.P.MISRA, S.P.BHARUCHA
Sidhartha Tubes LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise – Respondent


(1) THE order under appeal was passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal.

(2) THE appellants manufacture mild steel pipes and tubes. About 30% of the production is cleared at that stage and the product is then known as black pipe. The balance production is taken to a separate shed in the appellants factory premises and galvanised. The dispute is in relation to the galvanised black pipe. According to the appellants, what they clear is black pipe, the process of galvanisation is not a process of manufacture and no addition can be made to the assessable value of the black pipe on account of the galvanisation that subsequently occurred. The Tribunal rejected the contention. It said that the appellants themselves had, in their classification list, declared M.S. black pipes and galvanised pipes as their products. In such a situation, the mere fact that galvanisation was done subsequent to paying duty on the M.S. black pipes could not, by itself, be a ground for not including the cost of galvanisation in the assessable value of the black pipes subjected to the process of galvanisation. While that process did not amount to manufacture, it added to



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top