G.B.PATTANAIK, M.B.SHAH
Mohd. Ayubdhar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nct Of Delhi – Respondent
(1) THE two appellants have been convicted under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of TADA and Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act as well as under Sections 302/120-B IPC. For their conviction under different provisions of TADA, they have been sentenced to imprisonment for five years and six years respectively and for their conviction under Sections 302/120-B, they have been sentenced to imprisonment for life. From the records, it transpires that Appellant 1 Mohd. Ayubdhar was arrested in a hotel on 6-5-1991 and it is alleged by the prosecution that explosive substance was recovered from him. For this incident, FIR No. 178 of 1991 was made and investigation proceeded with. On the same day, that is on 6-5- 1991, sometime later the other accused also was arrested and certain explosive substances were recovered from him and the FIR that was registered in respect of him was FIR No. 179 of 1991. Besides this, two FIRs, one in respect of an incident of explosion that had occurred outside Delite Cinema on 25-1-1991 when a case had been registered which was FIR No. 30 of 1991 and another incident that happened inside the toilet of Jubilee Cinema on 27-1-1991, as a result of which on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.