D.P.MOHAPATRA, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Devi Dayal Kansal – Appellant
Versus
Raj Roop – Respondent
S.B.Majmudar, J. , D.P.Mohapatra, J.
(1) -LEAVE granted.
(2) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties finally in this appeal.
(3) THE short question is whether the appellants-claimants who are dependants of the deceased who died on account of motor accident, should be awarded interest on the enhanced amount granted by the High Court. The learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 who is the only contesting respondent submitted that it was a discretionary order. We cannot agree to that submission. Respondent No. 1 who is the driver has not thought it fit to contest the proceedings and has remained served. In our view, once the High Court has thought it fit to enhance in appeal compensation payable to the dependants of the deceased, in fairness, interest should have been granted on the enhanced compensation unless there was any cogent reason for denying them the benefit which does not exist in the facts of the present case and the High Court has also not noted the same. Only on this short ground, the appeal is allowed to the limited extent that enhanced compensation granted by the High Court will bear interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.