1. Conviction under Section 494 read with Section 109 IPC — Settlement reached between convicted appellants and complainant wife — Application for compounding of offence. (Para 2 )
Back
Next 
1999 Supreme(SC) 784
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.T.Nanavati : S.N.Phukan
Parameswari
Versus
Vennila
Case No. : 741 of 1999
Date of Decision : 8/2/99
The offence of bigamy under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code is compoundable with the consent of the wife and the permission of the Court, provided the settlement is reasonable and the consent is free and genuine.
Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 494 and 109 - Compounding of offences - Conviction for bigamy - Settlement reached between the parties with the consent of the wife - Where the compromise appears reasonable, in the interest of the wife, and the consent is free and genuine, the Court may grant permission to compound the offence, leading to the acquittal of the accused. (Para 2)
Facts of the case:
The appellants were convicted for an offence punishable under Section 494 read with Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, a settlement was reached between the appellants and the complainant (the wife) in the presence of village elders. A joint application for permission to compound the offence was filed, supported by the independent consent of the wife, who is an educated woman.
Findings of Court:
The compromise is reasonable and in the interest of the wife. The consent provided by the wife is free and genuine.
Issues: Whether the offence under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code is compoundable with the consent of the wife and permission of the Court.
Ratio Decidendi: The offence in question is compoundable subject to the consent of the wife and the permission of the Court. Given the genuine nature of the consent and the reasonableness of the settlement, permission to compound the offence is granted, resulting in the acquittal of the convicts.
Result: Appellants stand acquitted of the offence.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Appellants and complainant sought permission to compound the offence based on a settlement agreement. (Para 2 )
3. The compromise is reasonable, in the interest of the wife, and the consent provided is free and genuine. (Para 2 )
4. Offence under Section 494 IPC is compoundable subject to the consent of the wife and permission of the Court. (Para 2 )
5. Application to compound the offence granted — Appellants acquitted — Bail bonds cancelled. (Para 2 )
6. Is an offence under Section 494 IPC compoundable?
Yes, the offence is compoundable provided there is consent from the wife and permission is granted by the Court. (Para 2 )
7. What factors does the court consider when granting permission to compound an offence involving a marital dispute?
The court evaluates whether the compromise is reasonable, serves the interest of the aggrieved party, and whether the consent given is free and genuine. (Para 2 )
G.T.NANAVATI, J.
(1) LEAVE granted.
(2) THE appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 494 read with Section 109 IPC. They have now arrived at a settlement with complainant Vennila, wife of the appellant Sivaprakasam. Compromise was made in the presence of panchayatdars of their village Mannachanallur. The compromise agreement duly signed by the parties and panchayatdars is placed on record of this Court. The appellants and complainant Vennila have now filed a joint application for permission to compound the offence proved against the appellants. The wife has also filed her consent independently and is also represented by an advocate. The compromise on the face of it appears to be reasonable and in the interest of the wife. The consent given by the wife also appears to be free and genuine. She is an educated woman. The offence in this case is compoundable with the consent of the wife and permission of the Court. In our opinion, this is a fit case in which permission deserves to be granted. Accordingly, we grant the application for permission to compound the offence with the result that the appellants stand acquitted of the offence for which they have been held guilty. The appeals are disposed of accordingly. The bail bonds executed by the appellants shall stand cancelled.
