SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1273

M.SRINIVASAN, N.S.HEGDE, B.N.KIRPAL
State Of W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Atis Chandra Sinha – Respondent


(1) THE only question which arises in this appeal is that land which was dedicated to the deity before the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 (for short "the Act") was enacted would fall within the purview of Section 6(1)(i) of the said Act if the proceeds or income from the said land are not being used exclusively for the benefit of the deity.

(2) THE facts briefly stated are that the land in question originally belonged to the Singha family of the Paikpara Raj. Some of the property belonging to this family was dedicated to Sree Sree Iswar Radha Ballav Jiew Thakur, with which we are concerned in the present appeal. It appears that amongst the members of the family dispute arose pertaining to the manner in which the property belonging to the family was to be partitioned. Reference was first made to one Arthur Phillips to act as an arbitrator and give his award. Subsequently, Sir R.C. Mitter was appointed as an arbitrator by order dated 9-5-1892 passed in a suit which was pending between the parties. The terms of reference to the said arbitrator included the question as to which were the properties which belonged to debuttar and were, therefore, not liable to b










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top