SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 388

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ruma Pal : S.N.Phukan : S.P.Bharucha
Collector Of Central Excise, Indore
Versus
Madhya Pradesh State Industrial Corporation
Case No. : 1866 of 1990
Date of Decision : 2/16/00

(1) THE relevant portion of the notification in question, for the purposes of this appeal, reads thus:

"... belonging to or maintained by the Central Government or a State Government...."

(2) THE factory in question belongs to the respondent. The respondent is a company registered under the provisions of the Companies Act. Of its shares, all but one are owned by the Governor of Madhya Pradesh and that one is owned by the Director of Industries. Being a company, the respondent is a legal entity and it is that legal entity which owns the factory. But the question is: who maintains the factory? There is no evidence upon the record in this behalf. It is, therefore, necessary to set aside the order of the Tribunal under challenge and of the authorities below and to remand the matter to the Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Gwalior, to hear and decide the matter afresh only insofar as the maintenance of the factory is concerned. The parties shall be at liberty to lead further evidence in this behalf.

(3) ORDER on the appeal accordingly.

(4) NO order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top