SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 851

A.P.MISRA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Punjab University – Appellant
Versus
Narinder Kumar – Respondent


S.V.MANOHAR, J.

(1) THE appellant Punjab University, Chandigarh had issued an advertisement No. 6/93 inviting application for verious posts in the University, fixing 9/7/1993 as the last date for receiving applications. Among the posts so advertised were two posts of Lecturers in Gandhian Studies. The advertisement prescribed qualifications for various posts. These were under two heads. A - Essential and B - Desirable/ Essential Specialisations etc. Under Head A there were two sub-paragraphs which read as follows:- A. ESSENTIAL:

(A) Good academic record with at least 55% marks or an equivalent grade at Masters degree level in the relevant subject from any Indian University, or an equivalent degree from a Foreign University.

(B) Candidates besides fulfilling the above qualifications should have cleared the Joint Preliminary Test (JPT) for the appointment as lecturers in Universities and colleges in the State of Punjab and Union Territory of Chandigarh or eligibility test for Lecturers conducted by UGC, CSIR or similar test accredited by the UGC. However, this requirement will not be applicable to candidates (i) who have passed UGC/CSIR Jr. F. Examinatio










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top