SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 492

K.T.THOMAS, M.B.SHAH
Ashok Dhingra – Appellant
Versus
N. C. T. Of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K.Gambhir, S.N.KHERDEKAR, T.C.SHARMA

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) AFTER hearing learned Counsel for the Appellant, Mr. AltafAhmad, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent and Mr. M.S. Ganesh, learned senior Counsel for the complainant, we pass the following order:

(3) THE offence now alleged against the Appellant is under Section 120B, 420, 468,471 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. He is alleged to have cheated a Japanese national in a whopping sum exceeding Rs. 65 Lacs. These are of course prima facie circumstances not entitling him to be released on bail. But on the other side we noticed that he was in custody from 5.7.1999 to 10.12.1999 and, therefore, to continue to detain him during the pre-trial stage may not be in the interest of justice. Therefore we permit him to continue on bail as per the interim order passed by us on 10.12.1999, if he would abide by the following conditions : 1. He shall report at the Office of the Crime Branch, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi on all alternate days between 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. 2. He will not leave the limits of the State of Delhi without permission from the trial court; 3. He shall surrender his passport within one week to the tri


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top