S.N.VARIAVA, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Bank Of India – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer – Respondent
(1) THIS appeal is by special leave. Respondent No. 3 is employed as a clerk in the Regional Collection Centre, Kanpur.
(2) HE filed an application under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for computation of special assistants allowance at Rs. 456 on the basis of the two third months rotation in a year for the years 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1986. The appellant-bank opposed the said application. The Labour Court computed the amount payable to respondent No. 3 at Rs 5,016. The order made by the Labour Court was challenged by way of a writ petition before the High Court. In the High Court the contention put forth on behalf of the appellant was that the conditions of service of workmen are governed by the Sastri award or Desai award. However, the High Court rejected this contention that this award had ceased to apply in the year 1966, in view of the decision of this Court in Central Bank of India v. Sisir Kumar Shaw AIR 1976 SC 929 : 1976 (2) SCC 859 : 1976-I-LLJ-90. Hence, this appeal by special leave.
(3) AT the time when this matter was considered at the preliminary stage, the appellant was directed to pay the amount awarded by the Labour Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.