SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1906

S.N.VARIAVA, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Bank Of India – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer – Respondent


(1) THIS appeal is by special leave. Respondent No. 3 is employed as a clerk in the Regional Collection Centre, Kanpur.

(2) HE filed an application under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for computation of special assistants allowance at Rs. 456 on the basis of the two third months rotation in a year for the years 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1986. The appellant-bank opposed the said application. The Labour Court computed the amount payable to respondent No. 3 at Rs 5,016. The order made by the Labour Court was challenged by way of a writ petition before the High Court. In the High Court the contention put forth on behalf of the appellant was that the conditions of service of workmen are governed by the Sastri award or Desai award. However, the High Court rejected this contention that this award had ceased to apply in the year 1966, in view of the decision of this Court in Central Bank of India v. Sisir Kumar Shaw AIR 1976 SC 929 : 1976 (2) SCC 859 : 1976-I-LLJ-90. Hence, this appeal by special leave.

(3) AT the time when this matter was considered at the preliminary stage, the appellant was directed to pay the amount awarded by the Labour Court






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top