SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1047

B.N.KIRPAL, N.S.HEGDE, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
Regional Manager, Rajastan State Road Tranport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Ghanshyam Sharma – Respondent


B.N.KIRPAL, J.

(1) SPECIAL leave granted.

(2) THE respondent in the present case was employed as a conductor by the appellant. On more than one occasion, he was punished having been charge-sheeted on the ground of not issuing the tickets to the passengers. In the instant case, it was found that he was carrying 23½ passengers without ticket and an inquiry was conducted and he was removed from service.

(3) ON a reference being made, the labour court invoked its jurisdiction under section 11 (A) and while upholding the finding that the respondent was guilty of misconduct, it directed the respondents reinstatement, with continuity of service but without backwages. The learned single judge of the High Court set aside the award which decision has been reversed by the division bench. Hence, this appeal.

(4) THIS Court in Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation v. B.S. Hullikatti, [JT 2001 (2) SC 72], has held that in such cases where the bus conductors carry passengers without ticket or issue tickets at a less rate than the proper rate, the said acts would inter alia amount to either being a case of dishonesty or of gross negligence and such c


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top