SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 89

G.B.PATTANAIK, R.P.SETHI, S.S.M.QUADRI
Noida Entrepreneurs Association – Appellant
Versus
Noida – Respondent


(1) HAVING heard Amicus and learned counsel for the parties for about half an hour the Court passed the following order :

(2) MR. Naveen Prakash appearing for the NOIDA Authority seeks permission to withdraw his vakalat. He is permitted to be withdrawn. Mr. Ajay K. Agrawal now enters appearance for the NOIDA.

(3) IT is really surprising that though more than two years have elapsed In the meantime, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has failed to I submit Its report to this Court. The faith of citizens on the CBI will stand eroded If this sort of callous attitude is shown by the CBI concerning a matter where the Apex Court of the country Is In sessin of the matter and has been extending time for the CBI to file Its report aso that appropriate action/direction could be given. The learned counsel appearing of the CBI, however, undertakes that the report in question will be filed "within four weeks from today.

(4) THE State of U.P. is directed to file an affidavit indicating what final action, if any, has been taken on the basis of three reports which have gone into the alleged irregularities in the matter of allotment of land in NOIDA.

(5)


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top