SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1864

S.N.VARIAVA, S.RAJENDRA BABU
L. R. Ferror Alloys LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Mahavir Mahto – Respondent


S.RAJENDRA BABU, J.

(1) ON March 23, 1995 an accident took place in the factory of the appellant at about 3 p.m. while respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) was pouring water for cooling the hot slab when the slab burst causing - bum injuries on his face resulting in loss of sight in both eyes.

(2) A claim was made by the respondent before the Commissioner under the Workmens Compensation Act. The Commissioner determined the amount payable by way of compensation to the respondent. In addition he also quantified the penalty and interest payable for the delayed payment made by the appellant. The matter was carried in appeal to the High Court. There was no dispute regarding quantum of compensation payable, and all that was to be considered was whether the appellant is liable to pay the penalty and interest.

(3) ON that aspect of the matter the learned single Judge noticed that the compensation due under the statute had not been paid within one month from the date of accident and therefore appellant was liable to: pay penalty and interest from the date the amount became due and payable which meant the date of accident or at the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top