1. Placement of officers Grade I in new grades and scales under State Bank of India Officers (Determination of Terms and Conditions of Service) Order, 1979 challenged as discriminatory. (Para 1 )
Back
Next 
2000 Supreme(SC) 1969
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.N.Agrawal : G.B.Pattanaik
K.Thimmappa
Versus
Chairman, Central Bd.Of Dirs.Sbi
Case No. : 665 , 668 of 1998
Date of Decision : 12/5/00
Classification for cadre restructuring is valid under Article 14 if based on an intelligible differentia with a rational nexus to the object, provided confirmation is based on satisfactory completion of probation/training rather than the mere availability of substantive vacancies.
Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 - Banking Act - Section 43 - Service conditions and restructuring of officer grades - Placement and fitment of existing officers into new scales - Validity of classification based on date of confirmation - A classification is valid if it is founded on an intelligible differentia and has a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved. (Paras 3-5)
(B) Service Law - Confirmation and Seniority - The principle that confirmation is an uncertain event applies where confirmation depends on the availability of vacancies; however, where confirmation is based on the satisfactory completion of a probationary period or training, it can serve as a rational basis for placement in different grades during cadre restructuring. (Para 4)
(C) Cadre Restructuring - Merger of grades - The merger of pre-existing grades into fewer categories during standardization does not necessarily amount to demotion or hostile discrimination, provided there is a reasonable basis for the placement. (Para 6)
Facts of the case:
Under a service order for restructuring management cadres, officers of a specific grade were bifurcated based on their date of confirmation. Those confirmed on or before a specified cut-off date were placed in a higher management scale, while others were placed in a junior management scale along with officers from a lower pre-existing grade. The affected officers challenged this as arbitrary and discriminatory.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the cut-off date for confirmation was determined based on probation periods and service guidelines for the higher scale. The classification was deemed reasonable as it was based on the completion of probation and training, not vacancy availability. The restructuring was seen as a standard exercise in cadre adjustment.
Issues: Whether bifurcating officers of the same pre-existing grade based on their date of confirmation into two different new grades is discriminatory under Article 14; whether such placement constitutes a demotion; and whether the cut-off date chosen had a rational nexus with the object of restructuring.
Ratio Decidendi: For a classification to be permissible under Article 14, it must be founded on an intelligible differentia with a rational relation to the object. In the context of cadre restructuring, if the placement is based on relevant factors like completed probation and service experience, it is not arbitrary. The "uncertainty" of confirmation applies only when confirmation is tied to vacancy availability, not when it is tied to performance and training.
Result: Transferred cases/petitions and writ petitions dismissed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
- constitutional law
-
administrative law
-
judicial review
- scope of review of administrative decisions (Para 5)
- delegated legislation
- service law
- practice and procedure
-
judicial review
Table of Contents
2. Petitioners argued classification based on confirmation date was irrational and violative of equality. Bank argued placement was based on relevant factors and reasonable. (Para 2 , 3 )
3. Court held confirmation under statutory order did not suffer from 'inglorious uncertainty' and cut-off date had rational nexus with placement objective. (Para 4 , 5 )
4. Classification of officers based on date of confirmation for placement in restructured grades is valid if based on rational criteria and not arbitrary. (Para 5 )
5. Transferred cases and writ petitions dismissed; placement under the Service Order upheld as not violative of Article 14. (Para 12 )
6. Can classification of employees based on date of confirmation for placement in restructured grades be valid under Article 14?
Yes, classification based on confirmation date is valid if it is founded on an intelligible differentia having rational relation to the object of restructuring. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 )
7. Does the principle of 'inglorious uncertainty of confirmation' apply to statutory service rules providing for automatic confirmation after probation?
No, the principle does not apply where statutory provisions clearly define probation period and confirmation upon satisfactory completion, removing uncertainty. (Para 4 )
8. Can merged grades and placement of erstwhile officers of different grades in a single new grade be challenged as discriminatory or a demotion?
No, merger of pre-existing grades during restructuring for standardisation does not amount to discrimination or demotion as it is part of cadre adjustment. (Para 5 , 6 )
9. What is the scope of judicial review of placement and fitment decisions made during cadre restructuring?
Courts will not ordinarily interfere with such decisions unless they are found to be totally arbitrary, irrational, or motivated by mala fides. (Para 5 )
G.B.PATTANAIK, J.
(1) THESE Transferred Cases from different High Courts relate to the common question, namely, in the matter of placement of existing officers in the new grades and scale in the State Bank of India made under State Bank of India Officers (Determination of Terms and Conditions of Service) Order 1979, (hereinafter referred to as The Service Order), under Paragraph 7 of the said Order is discriminatory in nature, so far as it deals with the Officers Grade I. The Central Board of the State Bank of India in exercise of power conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 43 of the State Bank of India Act 1955 made the condition of Service Order which came into force with effect from 1.10.1979. Paragraph 7 deals with the placement of the existing officers on the appointed date in the corresponding grades and scale as per the table given in Schedule I and Paragraph 8 deals with the fitment of the said existing officers in the new grade and scale of pay. Prior to coming into force of the condition of Service Order, in the State Bank of India there were different grades of officers in the organisational structure and so also in other Nationalised and Subsidiary Banks. In the year 1973 the Government of India appointed a Committee, called Pillai Committee for bringing uniformity and standardisation in the conditions of service of the officers of various Nationalised Banks. The said recommendations of the Pillai Committee was later on applied to the State Bank of India and its Associate Banks with suit K. Thimmappa & Ors. v. Chairman, Central Bd. of Dirs. SBI & Anr. [PATTANAIK, J.] SC351 able modification having regard to their special features. So far as the State Bank of India is concerned, the entire re-structuring of its officers was made by passing the conditions of Service Order which came into force on 1.10.1979. Paragraph 6 of the Order deals with categorisation. Paragraph 7 of Order deals with the placement of existing officer on the appointed date in corresponding grades and scales. Paragraph 8 deals with fitment In the new scales of pay. The aforesaid 3 paragraphs are quoted hereinbelow in ex ten so:-
"CATEGORISATION 6. (1) Having regard to the responsibilities and functions exercisable, every post of an officer in the Bank shall be categorised by the Central Board or the Executive Committee or the Competent Authority as falling in any one of the grades or scales mentioned in paragraph 4 and such categorisation may be reviewed from time to time by the Central Board or the Executive Committee or the Competent Authority. Provided that the categorisation of the posts in existence on the appointed date shall be done before the expiry of two years from that date and shall, in respect of the posts in the senior management and top executive grades, be done by a committee appointed for the purpose by the Chairman of the Bank. (2) For the purpose of categorisation of posts under sub-paragraph (1), every branch or office of the Bank shall be classified by the Bank in accordance with the criteria to be approved by the Central Board or the Executive Committee as small, medium, large, very large or exceptionally large category. Placement of existing officers on the appointed date in corresponding grades and scales. 7. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 6, existing officers serving in the grades and scales of pay mentioned in column 1 of the table given in Schedule I to this order shall be placed as on the appointed date in the grade and scale specified there-against in column 2 of the said schedule. Provided that any difficulties or anomalies arising out of the above placement shall be referred to a committee of such persons as the Chairman of the Bank may appoint and the decision of that committee in this regard shall be final. Fitment in the new scales of pay. 8. (1) Every existing officer placed in any of the new grades and scales of pay in accordance with paragraph 7, shall be fitted at such stage in
