SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 365

A. S. ANAND, BRIJESH KUMAR, R. C. LAHOTI
Dilip K. Basu – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


A.S.ANAND,  CJI.

(1) WE have perused the office report dated 21/2/2001 and find that pursuant to our order dated 12/1/2001, an affidavit has been filed only on behalf of the Union Territory of Pondicherry in Criminal Misc. Petition No. 480/2001. None of the other States and Union Territories have filed their response to the suggestions made in Cri. Misc. Petition No. 480/2001. Even the Union of India has not filed its response so far.

(2) LEARNED counsel appearing for various States and Union Territories as also for the Union of India submit that within four weeks they will file the response and precisely indicate the steps which the concerned State/ Union Territory are taking to ensure compliance with all the directions given in D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) 1 SCC 416: (1997 AIR SCW 233: AIR 1997 SC 610 : 1997 Cri LJ 743) in letter and spirit as well as to prevent custodial violence. They will also respond to the suggestions made in Cri. Misc. Petition No. 480/2001. We grant them time to do the needful as prayed for.

(3) LIST the matter after five weeks on a date to be fixed in consultation with the learned Amicus Curiae.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top