SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 966

KULDIP SINGH, FAIZAN UDDIN, K.VENKATASWAMI
M. C. Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


(1) MR M.C. Mehta - environmentalist lawyer - has filed this public interest petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the Haryana Pollution Control Board (the Board) to control the pollution caused by the stone crushers, pulverisers and mine operators in the Faridabad- Balabgarh area. We are in the process of monitoring the petition. The core question which we propose to deal with in this order is whether - to preserve environment and control pollution - the mining operations should be stopped within the radius of five kilometres (kms) from the tourist resorts of Badkal Lake and Surajkund in the State of Haryana.

(2) THIS court by order dated 20-1 1-1995 directed the Board to inspect and ascertain the impact of mining operations on the ecologically sensitive area of Badkal Lake and Surajkund. The inspection was done by a team of the Board comprising Dr B. Sengupta, Senior Scientist, Shri Lalit Kapoor, Senior Environmental Engineer, Shri R.C. Kataria, Environmental Engineer and Dr J. Moitra, Scientist B. The inspection report of the Board was placed before this Court along with an affidavit filed by Dr S.P. Chakrabarti, Member secr













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top