SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 708

M.B.SHAH, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
M. C. Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


M.JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

(1) IA No. 68 allowed.

(2) IN regard to the alternative site for parking of vehicles the Agra Development Authority is directed to go on with the development of vehicle car parking site as mentioned in Plan 1 Amrud-ka-Tila (p. 45 of the paper-book in IA No. 66). So far as the construction and location of the shops are concerned in regard to which IA No. 67 has been filed separately, the question will be taken up at the next date of hearing. For the purpose of developing the vehicle parking area the Mission Management Board, Government of U.P. will make the funds available to the Agra Development Authority within a period of one week from today. A copy of this order will be sent to the said authority. Copy of this order will also be sent to the Chief Secretary, Government of U.P. by the counsel appearing for the State of U.P. The construction will be supervised and monitored by the Agra Development Authority.

(3) WHILE proceeding with the development of the vehicle parking area, report of the Technical Sub-Committee dated 26-5-1998 will be kept in mind and strictly observed. For the time being the construction of kiosks as per



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top