SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1791

S.N.PHUKAN, S.S.M.QUADRI
Anuradha Dalal – Appellant
Versus
Rohit Dalal – Respondent


S.N.PHUKAN, J.

(1) THE petitioner is the wife of the respondent. She seeks transfer of Application No. 145 of 1998 (titled Major Rohit Dalal v. Anuradha Dalal) pending in the Family Court No. 1, Jaipur (Rajasthan) to the Competent Court of District Judge at Bhiwani (Haryana).

(2) THE grounds on which transfer of the case is sought is that she is living in Bhiwani (Haryana) and has to travel a distance of 300 k.m. (one way) which takes about 8 hours to reach Jaipur; that since in the Family Court at Jaipur advocates are not permitted, she has to attend on every date of hearing which is causing great hardship. The respondent, it is submitted, is also not residing in Jaipur but is residing at different places for discharging his official duties. Therefore, it would not cause any inconvenience to the respondent also.

(3) IN the counter affidavit, filed by the respondent, it is not disputed that in Jaipur the parties have to be present in person and the advocates are not permitted. However, what is stated is that the father of the petitioner have lot of influence and, therefore, it would not be conducive for the respondent to have the proceedings cond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top