RUMA PAL, S.P.BHARUCHA, DORAISWAMY RAJU
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Trivandrum – Appellant
Versus
Autokast LTD. – Respondent
S.P.BHARUCHA, J.
(1) THE question that was before the High Court read thus :
"WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the interest income is not assessable to tax in the hands of the appellant?"
(2) THE High Court answered the question against the Revenue. The Revenue is in appeal by special leave.
(3) IT is not now in dispute that the appeal must succeed, having to the Judgment AIR 1998 of this Court in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilizers limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax (227 ITR 172).
(4) THE civil appeal is accordingly allowed. The judgment and order under challenge is set aside. The question is answered in the negative and in favour of the Revenue. In other words, the interest income is assessable to tax in the hands of the assessee.
(5) NO order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.