SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1369

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
S. S. Gurayya – Respondent


K.T.THOMAS, J.

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THE Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellants was dismissed only on the ground that the delay of 253 days has not been explained, As the application for condonation of delay was dismissed the appeal also was dismissed.

(3) IN fact the appellants have stated in the application filed under Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act that after the pronouncement of the judgment by single Judge on 27-5- 98 the appellants have moved an application for clarification and that application was not disposed of till 8-7-98 when appellants found it imperatively necessary to approach the Division Bench. We are told that clarification petition has not been disposed of even now. The aforesaid circumstance was highlighted as the ground for the delay of 253 days.

(4) BY adopting a pragmatic attitude we are inclined to condone the delay of 253 days involved in filing the said LPA. Accordingly we allow this appeal and the petition to condone the delay would stand allowed. Resultantly the LPA is regularised and is now to be disposed of by the Division Bench in accordance, with law.

(5) THE Appeal is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top