SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 420

M.B.SHAH, D.P.WADHWA
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Gujarat State Warehousing Corporation LTD. – Respondent


(1) THE Revenue sought reference on the following questions of law for opinion of the High Court:

"1. Whether the claim of the assessee for exemption under Section 10(29) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of interest income of Rs 6,03,374, staff quarters rent of Rs5147, miscellaneous income of Rs 5647 and supervision charges of Rs 79,081 was rightly accepted by the CIT (A) and confirmed by the Tribunal? 2. Whether the income received by the assessee from any source other than from letting of godowns or warehouses is exempt under Section 10(29) of the IT Act, 1961?"

(2) APPLICATIONS under Sections 256(1) and 256(2) by the Revenue were dismissed.

(3) AGGRIEVED, the Revenue came to this Court. The assessment year involved is 1981-82. We find that on similar questions for the two assessment years viz. 1979-80 and 1983-84 this Court dismissed the special leave petitions filed by the Revenue by the following order: SLPs (C) Nos. 8701 of 1993 and 8808 of 1986

"DELAY condoned. In view of the judgment of this Court in Union of India v. U.P. State Warehousing Corpn. wherein the judgment of the Allahabad High Court in U.P. State Warehousing Corpn. v. ITO ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top