N.P.SINGH, S.B.MAJMUDAR, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Consolidated Coffee LTD. : Consolidated Coffee LTD. : Anil Kumar Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
Coffee Board, Bangalore: Union Of India: Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
N.P. Singh, J.
1. The appellants are the growers of coffee. They filed writ petitions for injuncting the Coffee Board respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the Board) from making any payment under the head Purchase Tax out of the Pool Fund maintained under Section 30 of the Coffee Act, 1942. According to the appellants, the Board cannot discharge its liability in respect of payment of Purchase Tax to the State Government, under the provisions of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) out of the Pool Fund.
2. The High Court held that growers/producers were not liable under Section 5 (3) (a) of the Act to pay the tax in respect of the sale of coffee by them to the Coffee Board. It also held that the Board was liable to pay the Purchase Tax under Section 6 of the Act. But according to the High Court, the Board was authorized in law to pay the tax which it is liable to pay to the State Government, out of the Pool Fund. On that finding, the writ petitions, filed on behalf of the appellants, were dismissed.
3. Section 5 (3) (a) of the Act provides that the tax under the Act shall be levied in the case of sale of goods mentioned in Column No. 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.