SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 421

K.T.THOMAS, Y.K.SABHARWAL
Radhakrishnan Prabhakaran – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


(1) THE petitioner is a law graduate. He is preventively detained under Section 3(l)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the COFEPOSA Act). His detention commenced on 26/4/1999 and is for a period of one year. This writ petition is filed under Section 32 of the Constitution challenging the aforesaid detention order.

(2) THE petitioner arrived at Anna International Airport, Chennai on 25/4/1999 from Singapore by Singapore Airlines. He was intercepted by customs authorities and on interrogation the authorities realised that he was carrying with him in one of his baggage items electronic goods worth about Rs. 16 lakhs. After recording his statement he was arrested on the next day. He moved the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai for bail on 28/4/1999 Though his application for bail was dismissed by the said Magistrate and again dismissed when the motion was repeated by him he was, however, released on bail by order dated 28/6/1999.

(3) IT was in the aforesaid background that detention order, now under challenge, has been passed against him. Mr. K.K. Mani, learned counsel who ar









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top