SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1196

A.P.MISRA, K.T.THOMAS
Abdul Rashid Ibrahim Mansuri – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


(1) IN this case the fact situation as found by the High Court is this: Four gunny bags of charas were seized by the authorities from the autorickshaw driven by the accused himself. When a plea is made on the strength of Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 the focal question is whether the gunny bags were in the physical possession of the accused or not. If they were in the physical possession of the accused the mandate of Section 50 would apply. While considering this aspect our attention has been drawn to the decision rendered by a two-Judge Bench of this Court dated 15-9-1999 (in Criminal Appeal No. 807 of 1997) wherein the following observations have been made:

"WE do not find any substance in this contention as the charas was not found on the person of the appellants but it was found kept in a bag which was hanging on the scooter on which they were riding. Therefore, this was not a case where the person of the accused was searched and from his person narcotic drug or psychotropic substance was found. The correct position of the law on this point has been stated by this Court in State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh

(2) LEARNED co


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top