SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 776

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Akhilesh Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


(1) THE petitioner stands convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code. He filed an appeal in 1998 before the High Court of Patna and then applied for suspension of the sentence. The High Court declined to do so. He then moved the High Court for taking up his appeal out of turn or to suspend the sentence on which application the impugned order has been passed. It read thus: "This is appeal of the year 1998. Earlier the prayer for bail of the appellant was rejected on 5-8-1998. The appellant went before the Apex Court in SLA No. 23 of 1999 and the prayer for bail of the appellant was From the Judgment and Order dated 21-1-2000 in CRLA No. 347 of 1998 of the High Court of Patna dismissed as withdrawn. In this Court the appeal of the year 1994 is being taken up for hearing. No case for grant of bail is made out. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected."

(2) IF what the High Court observed is correct, the possibility of that appeal being boarded for final hearing can only be in the year 2004. A convicted person being kept in jail pending appeal for such a long period is not a desirable course, but it is only one side of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top