SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1411

G.B.PATTANAIK, M.B.SHAH
Kurukshetra University – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Gupta – Respondent


(1) THE University has assailed the decision of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana calling upon the University to enforce the resolution of the Executive Council dated 26-4-1994 by which resolution the Executive Council approved the recommendation of Justice Sodhi and decided the salary to be paid to an employee of the University. From the facts narrated, it appears that earlier the University itself did consider the question of salary to the employee concerned and by a resolution dated 16-11-1985 did not grant the relief in question. That resolution of the University dated 16-11-1985 became final inasmuch as the writ petition filed against the same was dismissed and special leave petition to this Court was also dismissed in 1986. Notwithstanding the finality to the aforesaid decision of the University a fresh representation on being filed by the employee in the year 1994, the Executive Council thought it fit to refer the said representation to a committee headed by Justice Sodhi, and that Committee on consideration of all the relevant materials decided as to what the salary of the employee ought to be and with effect from which date. The said recommendation of the Justic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top