SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1008

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.T.Thomas : M.B.Shah
Abhiram Veer
Versus
North Eastern Regional Agricultural Marketing Corporation Limited
Case No. : 200 , 209 of 1999
Date of Decision : 9/10/99
Advocates Appeared: Kumar Ranjit : Shroff Chirag M. : Shroff M.N.

Hardships faced by a party are not sufficient grounds for transferring cases, and personal exemption from appearance may be granted with specified conditions.

Headnote:

Transfer of Cases - Jurisdiction - Summary

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought transfer of 10 cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, citing the ground that the cause of action arose at Lucknow and only a court of Lucknow can exercise jurisdiction.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the hardships faced by the petitioner for attending the criminal cases in Guwahati were not sufficient for transferring the cases, as similar hardships would apply to the other side as well. However, the petitioner was allowed to apply for personal exemption from appearance in cases where he made the first appearance, subject to certain conditions.

Issues: Jurisdiction, Transfer of Cases, Hardships faced by the petitioner

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the mere fact of hardships faced by the petitioner was not sufficient for transferring the cases, and allowed the petitioner to apply for personal exemption from appearance in certain cases with conditions.

Final Decision: The transfer petitions were disposed of, and the petitioner was allowed to apply for personal exemption from appearance in certain cases with specified conditions.

K.T.THOMAS, J.

(1) THIS petition fur transfer of 10 cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be allowed on the ground specified in this petition (the ground shown is that the cause of action arose at Lucknow, and therefore, only a court of Lucknow can exercise jurisdiction). Question of jurisdiction is a matter which the petitioner will have to raise before the Court, where the case is now pending.

(2) LEARNED counsel then submitted the hardships inflicted on the petitioner for attending the criminal cases, pending before the courts in Guwahati, particularly when all the 10 different cases are posted on different dates. Counsel points out the situation in Guwahati poses danger to his life. We do not regard even those are sufficient for transferring the cases as that would apply to the other side also.

(3) HOWEVER, it is open to the petitioner to apply for personal exemption from appearance in cases where he made the first appearance. If any such motion is made, we direct the Magistrate concerned to exempt him from personal appearance on the following conditions:

1. The counsel on his behalf would be present in the court on all days when the cases are taken up

2. The petitioner will not dispute his identity.

3. The petitioner would be present in court when his presence is imperatively needed, such as, the examination under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

4. With these observations these transfer petitions are disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top