SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1008

K.T.THOMAS, M.B.SHAH
Abhiram Veer – Appellant
Versus
North Eastern Regional Agricultural Marketing Corporation LTD. – Respondent


K.T.THOMAS, J.

(1) THIS petition fur transfer of 10 cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be allowed on the ground specified in this petition (the ground shown is that the cause of action arose at Lucknow, and therefore, only a court of Lucknow can exercise jurisdiction). Question of jurisdiction is a matter which the petitioner will have to raise before the Court, where the case is now pending.

(2) LEARNED counsel then submitted the hardships inflicted on the petitioner for attending the criminal cases, pending before the courts in Guwahati, particularly when all the 10 different cases are posted on different dates. Counsel points out the situation in Guwahati poses danger to his life. We do not regard even those are sufficient for transferring the cases as that would apply to the other side also.

(3) HOWEVER, it is open to the petitioner to apply for personal exemption from appearance in cases where he made the first appearance. If any such motion is made, we direct the Magistrate concerned to exempt him from personal appearance on the following conditions:

1. The counsel on his behalf would be present in the cour



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top