SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.P. Bharucha and K. Venkataswami, JJ.
Civil Appeal Nos. 5577-79(NT) of 1993, 4606 of 1990 and 571-74(NT) of 1991
Decided On: 11.09.1996
Cooch-Behar Contractors Association and Ors.M. Banerjee and Co. and Anr. Nepal Chandra Banerjee Appellants
versus
State ofW.B. and Ors.State ofW.B. and Ors. State ofW.B. and Ors. Respondent
WITH
Appellants
versus
Respondent:
WITH
Appellants
versus
Respondent:
Constitution of India - Article 136 - Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - West Bengal Act 4 of 1984 – Section 6D - Liability to payment of tax on the transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of works contract and rate thereof - Construction of roads and bridges - Appellants are contractors and they execute civil construction works including construction of roads and bridges under different departments of Central and State Governments as well as respective Corporations - Such works include excavation of earth, drilling, construction of water channel and river bank protection - As a result of insertion of Section 6-D to Act, all transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) involved in execution of a works contract was deemed to be a sale of those goods by person making transfer and purchase of those goods by person to whom such transfer was made - Revenue sought to assess appellants under of purchasing goods in West Bengal in specified circumstances or any person making a sale under Section 6-D - Held, Learned counsel for applicants did not submit that such inclusion is in any way bad or unconstitutional. Expenses incurred on account of labour simpliciter surely cannot form a part of contractual transfer price simply because it is not a value of or valuable consideration for any goods unless such expense amounts to cost of freight or delivery for carrying goods to work site - It will depend on the circumstances in which or the purpose for which labour was employed - We, therefore, do not at this stage express any opinion one way or other on those charges and expenses as to whether or not they will form part of the contractual transfer price - In view ofthe above it is not necessary to go into this issue further - For foregoing reasons, we do not think there is any case for interference under Article 136 of Constitution - Appeals are dismissed.
JUDGMENT
Venkataswami, J.
1. Common questions of law arise out of a common judgment of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal dated 26-4-1990 rendered in RN-30(T), RN-31(T), RN-34(T), RN-I03(T), RN-367(T). RN-138(T), RN-338 and RN-339 of 1989.
2. The appellants are contractors and they execute civil construction works including construction of roads and bridges under different departments of the Central and State Governments as well as respective Corporations. Such works include excavation of earth, drilling, construction of water channel and river bank protection. Such works of contract were not brought under the net of sales tax till the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 (6 of 1941) (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") was amended by the West Bengal Act 4 of 1984 inserting Section 6-D and amending Section 2(c) of the Act. These amendments were pursuant to the 46th Amendment of the Constitution oflndia in the year 1982 inserting Clause 29-A in Article 366.
3. The constitutional validity of the 46th Amendment inserting Clause 29-A in Article 366 was challenged and this Court in Builders Assn. of India v. Union of India, AIRI989 SC 1371 , 1989 (2 )ARBLR356 (SC), (1989)2 CompLJI (SC), JTI989 (2 )SC 47 , 1989 (1 )SCALE770 , (1989 )2 SCC645 , [1989 ]2 SCR320 , [1989 ]73 STC370 (SC ) upheld the constitutionality of the said amendment.
4. As a result of the insertion of Section 6-D to the Act, all transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) involved in the execution of a works contract was deemed to be a sale of those goods by the person making the transfer and the purchase of those goods by the person to whom such transfer was made. The Revenue sought to assess the appellants under of purchasing goods in West Bengal in specified circumstances or any person making a sale under Section 6-D ....
6-D. (I) Liability to payment of tax on the transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of works contract and rate thereof.--(I) Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Act,n
(a) any transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) involved in the execution of a works contract (hereinafter referred to as contractual transfer) shall be deemed to be a sale of those goods by the person making the transfer and the purchase of those goods by the person to whom such transfer is made;
(b )(i) every dealer whose contractual transfer price during the last year ending on or before the 31 st day of March, 1984 exceeds rupees two lakhs shall, in addition to the tax payable by him under Section 5 and Section 6-B, if any, be liable to pay from the 1st day of April, 1984 a tax at the rate specified in Sub-section (3) of such part of his contractual transfer price as specified in Sub-section (2);
(ii) every dealer, other than a dealer referred to in Sub-clause (i), whose contractual transfer price during any year ending on or after the I st day of April, 1984 exceeds rupees two lakhs shall, in addition to the tax payable by him under Section 5 and Section 6-B, if any, be liable to pay from the first day of the year immediately following such year a tax at the rate specified in Sub-section (3) of such pan of his contractual transfer price as specified in Sub-section (2);
(iii) every dealer who has become liable to pay tax under Sub-clause (i) or Sub-clause (ii) shall continue to be so liable until the expiry of three consecutive years during each of which the contractual transfer price does not exceed rupees two lakhs and on the expiry of such three years his liability to pay such tax shall cease;
(iv) every dealer, whose liability to pay tax has ceased under the provisions of Sub-clause (iii), shall, if the contractual transfer price during any year again exceeds rupees two lakhs, be liable to pay from the first day of the year immediately following such year the tax at the rate specified in Sub-section (3) of such part of this contractual transfer price as specified in Sub-section (2).
followed : Gannon Dunkerley and Co. v. State of Rajasthan
referred to : Builders Assn. of India v. Union of India
East India Tobacco Co. v. State of A.P.
P.M. Ashwathanarayana Setty v. State of Karnataka
Federation of Hotel and Restaurant Assn. of India v. Union of India
Kerala Hotel and Restaurant Assn. v. State of Kerala
Ganga Sugar Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.