SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 46

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Kalinga Tubes LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Majmudar, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. By consent of learned Advocates of both the sides the appeal is finally heard and is being disposed of by this judgment. The appellant Commissioner of Income Tax, has brought in challenge the judgment and order dated 13th May, 1987 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack answering the referred question Under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act. 1961 against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. It is the contention of the income-tax authorities that the question should be answered against the assessee. A few relevant facts centering round the question in controversy deserve to be noted at this stage.

3. The relevant assessment year is 1971-72. The respondent-assessee is a limited company which manufactures and sells steel tubes in the State of Orissa. During the previous year relevant to assessment year 1962-63, the assessee was liable to pay sales tax under the Central Sales Tax Act. The Sales Tax Officer Completed the assessment in respect of assessment year 1962-63 on 31 st March, 1966 and demanded an additional amount of Rs. 11 ,02,698. The assessee unsuccessfully carried the matter in appeal and then filed second appe










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top