1999 Supreme(SC) 746
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and R.M. Sahai, JJ.
Writ Petn. (C) No. 715 of 1990
Decided On: 13.05. I 993
All India Imam Organization and others Appellants
versus
Union of India and others Respondent
Wakf Boards are responsible for ensuring proper maintenance of religious services in mosques, including payment of remuneration to Imams.
Headnote:
IMAMS' REMUNERATION - WAKF ACT, 1954 - SECTIONS 9, 15 - DIRECTIONS ISSUED FOR PAYMENT OF REMUNERATION TO IMAMS OF MOSQUES.
Fact of the Case:
Imams of mosques approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking enforcement of their fundamental right against exploitation by Wakf Boards. They claimed that despite performing essential religious duties, they were not being paid adequate wages and sought basic wages to enable them to survive.
Finding of the Court:
The Court recognized the importance of Imams in leading community prayers and acknowledged that they needed sustenance due to the change in social and economic circumstances. It held that the Wakf Boards, which were responsible for supervising and administering Wakfs, could not escape their responsibility for ensuring proper maintenance of religious services in mosques.
Issues: 1. Whether Imams of mosques are entitled to remuneration for their services? 2. Whether Wakf Boards are responsible for paying remuneration to Imams? 3. How should the remuneration of Imams be determined?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that Imams are entitled to remuneration for their services, considering the nature of their duties and the change in social and economic circumstances. 2. The Court held that Wakf Boards are responsible for paying remuneration to Imams, as they are entrusted with the responsibility of supervising and administering Wakfs. 3. The Court directed the Union of India and the Central Wakf Board to prepare a scheme within six months for payment of remuneration to Imams, taking guidance from the scale of pay prevalent in the State of Punjab and Haryana.
Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition and issued directions for payment of remuneration to Imams of mosques. The scheme for determining the remuneration was to be prepared by the Union of India and the Central Wakf Board within six months, and it was to be implemented by every State Board.
ORDER
R. M. Sahai, J.
1. Imams, incharge of religious activities of the mosque (I) have approached this Court by way of this, representative, petition under Article 32 of the Constitution for enforcement of fundamental right against their exploitation by WakfBoards. Relief sought is direction to Central and State WakfBoards to treat the petitioner as employees of the Board and to pay them basic wages to enable them to survive. Basis of claim is glaring disparity between the nature of work and amount of remuneration. Higher pay scale is claimed for degree holders.
2. Imams perform the duty of offering prayer (Namaz) for congregation in mosques. Essentially the mosque is a centre of community worship where Muslims perform ritual prayers and where historically they have also gathered for political, social and cultural functions.(2) The functions of the mosque is summarised by the 13th Century Jurist Ibn Taymiyah as a place of gathering where prayer was celebrated and where public affairs were conducted.(3) All mosques are where Muslim men on an equalitarian basis rich or poor, noble or humble, stand in rows to perform their prayers behind the Imam. (4) Imams are expected to look after the cleanliness of mosque, call Azans from the balcony of the minarets to the whole religious meetings and propagate the Islamic faith. They are expected to be well versed in the Shariat, the holy Quran, the Hadiths, ethics, philosophy, social, economic and religious aspects. Imam or prayer leader is the most important appointee. In the early days the ruler himself filled this role; he was leader (Imam) of the government of war, and of the common Salat ("ritual prayer"). Under the Abbasids, when the caliph no longer conducted prayers on a regular basis, a paid Imam was appointed. While any prominent or learned Muslim can have the honor of leading prayers, each mosque specifically appoints a man well versed in theological matters to act as its Imam. He is in charge of the religious activities of the mosque, and it is his duty to conduct prayers five times a day in front of Mihrab.(5)
3. On nature of the duties performed by the Imams there is no dispute. But both the Union of India and various State WakfBoards of different States which have put in appearance in response to the notice issued by this Court have seriously disputed the manner of their appointment, right to receive any payment and absence of any relationship of master and servant. It is stated that the Imams or Muazzins are appointed by the Mutwallis. According to them the Wakf Boards have nothing to do either with their appointment or working. It is claimed that under Islamic religious practice they are not entitled to any emoluments as a matter of right as the Islamic law ordains
the Imams to offer voluntary service. They are said to be paid some money out of the donations received in mosques or by the Mutwallis of the Boards. Their job is stated to be honorary and not paid. Nature of duty under Islamic Shariat is stated to lead prayers which is performed voluntarily by any suitable Muslim without any monetary benefit. Some of the affidavits claim that they are appointed by people of the locality. The Union Government has specifically stated that the Islam does not recognise the concept of priesthood as in other religions and the selection ofImams is the sole prerogative of the members of the local community or the managing committee, if any, of the mosque. According to Karnataka IVakfBoard Ima-mat in the mosque is not considered to be empioymenl. The allegation of the petitioners that due to .meagre payment they are humiliated or insulted in the society, is denied and it is claimed that they are respectable persons who carry on the duty of Imamat as a part of religious activity and not for earning bread and butter. The Delhi WakfBoard pointed out that the honorarium is paid to an Imam as a consideration for his five time presence in the mosque regularly and punctually. The Board has de