SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1107

G.B.PATTANAIK, N.S.HEGDE
K. L. Arora – Appellant
Versus
S. S. Prasad – Respondent


ORDER

1. This Contempt Petition has been filed on the allegation that the order of this Court dated

4.] 2.1996, directing payment of compensation has not been complied with. Pursuant to the notice issued by this Court, a showcause has been filed clearly indicating therein that the applicant is facing a departmental proceeding on the allegation of misappropriation of huge funds of the Company and until and unless that departmental proceeding is concluded, question of making any payment pursuant to the order of this Court would not arise. In view of the stand taken by the Management in the show cause filed, we see no justification for initiating a contempt proceeding, as in our view the non-payment of the alleged due is not on account of any deliberate violation of the Courts orders, but on account of the pendency of a departmental proceeding.

2. The Contempt Petition is accordingly dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top