SUJATA V.MANOHAR, R.P.SETHI
Bhagwan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
ORDER
1. Delay condoned, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. Application for arraying proforma respondent Nos. 5 & 6 as appellant Nos. 3$4 is allowed.
3. Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) No. 3685/ 1998.
4. Both these appeals challenge the appointment of respondent No.3, Dr. Harpal Singh. as the State Drug Controlling Authority under a Notification dated 18.3.1996.
5. Rule 50-A of the Rules framed under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 prescribes qualifications of a Controlling Authority. Rule 50-A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 is as follows:
"Rule 50-A: Qualifications of Controlling Authority :_
(I) No person shall be qualified to be a Controlling Authority under the Act unless:-
(i) he is a graduate in pharmacy or Pharmaceutical Chemistry or in Medicine with specialisation in Clinical Pharmacology or Microbiology from a University established in India by law: and
(ii) he has experience in the manufacture or testing of drugs or enforcement of the provisions of the Act for a minimum period of five years;
Provided that the requirements as to the academic qualifications shall not apply to those Inspectors and the Government Analysts who were holding those posit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.