G.N.RAY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Achhan Rizvi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER
1. The matter has come-up for orders on LA. No.5 on what has been described as an "explosive situation" in Ayodhya as a result of declarations by certain religious groups that beginning 6th December, 1992 there will be a resumption of Kar Seva on the acquired site of 2. 77 acres in avowed violation of the orders of the High Court where petitions challenging the constitutionality of the acquisition are pending. There are also certain orders of this Court which, incorporating the orders of the High Court in this behalf, also have the effect of interdicting any constructional activity on the acquired land pending disposal of the proceedings.
2. What is poignant is that the arguments in the writ petitions before the High Court are concluded and the learned Judges have reserved their judgment. At this juncture some of the religious groups have threatened to take law into their own hands.
3. Mr. a.p. Sharma, in support of LA. No.5, submitted that having regard to the fact that the situation has reached - in the words of the learned Attorney General- a boiling point and with the known sympathy of the Governmental machinery in the State for the aspirations of the said religious group
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.