SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 931

S.P.BHARUCHA, S.MOHAN, S.C.AGRAWAL, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, S.R.PANDIAN
T. M. A. Pai Foundation – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER

1. These matters were posted before us on October 4 and 5, 1993 for orders with respect to the fee structure in private professional colleges and for other appropriate orders. We have heard the learned Solicitor General for the Union of India, the learned Advocate General for Karnataka and counsel for other States. In view of the non-admission of students to the private professional colleges even by now (first week of October) we called upon the counsel for the Union, the States and the private parties to tell us the way in which the present impasse can be resolved. We pointed out to the counsel that the refusal of the managements of the private professional colleges or, for that matter, their demand that they should be permitted to admit 50% of the students of their own choice cannot be and shall not be conceded. We made it clear that in case of failure of the parties to find a reasonable way out, this Court would be obliged to adopt coercive measures to enforce its judgment in Unnikrishnan, J.P. v. State of A.P., AIR1993 SC 2178, JT1993 (1)SC 474,1992 (2)SCALE703 ,(1993)1 SCC645 , [1993]1 SCR594 and other orders in that behalf.

2. The learned Solicitor General appearing for




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top