SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1229

N.S.HEGDE, S.P.BHARUCHA, S.S.M.QUADRI
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
S. S. Murthy – Respondent


(1) LEARNED Counsel for the appellants ana respondents are all agreed that having regard to the note of the Chief Justice .of Gujarat, dated 30th June, 1995 made in pursuance of the judgment of the learned Single Judge, which was affirmed by the judgment and order under challenge before us, and the subsequent decision of the Governor of Gujarat, these judgments may be said to have worked themselves out. It is now agreed that the Chief Justice of Gujarat should consider the representations of the present respondents before us de novo and without reference to or being in any way influenced by the judgment and order under challenge as also the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge. In this view of the matter, the civil appeals are disposed of

(2) NO order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top