SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 747

S.P.BHARUCHA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
Workmen Representeted By Hindustan V. O. Corporation LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Veg. Oils Corpn. LTD. – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THE order under challenge has been passed by a Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta. Its operative portion states that the writ petition filed by the present appellants and their application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act should be disposed of together, expeditiously. We are of the view that an application under Section 17-B should be disposed of before the principal petition and it should be disposed of most expeditiously.

(3) WE, therefore, set aside the order under challenge to the extent that it requires the disposal of the writ petition and the Section 17-B application together and we direct that the Section 17-B application should be disposed of with great promptitude and before disposal of the writ petition,

(4) THE Section 17-B application shall be listed before a learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court expeditiously, and the parties may seek a fixed date of hearing . It shall be open to the parties to raise all contentions in support of and against the application. It shall also be open to the First respondent to rely upon the order of the B.I.F.R. that it states has been passed.

(5)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top