SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 646

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.T.THOMAS
Supdt. , Narcotics Control Bureau, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
R. Paulsamy – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) RESPONDENT and his wife are now facing a prosecution for offences under Sections 8C, 21, 27A, 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and 193 and 120B Indian Penal Code. The case against them is that 2 kg. heroin had been recovered from a room which was in the possession of the respondent. At the relevant time he himself was a Superintendent. Customs, Preventive Unit Madurai. His wife was Superintendent of Central Excise and Customs at Thanjavur. First respondent moved for enlarging him on bail. A learned Single Judge of the High Court of Madras passed an order releasing him on bail on executing a bond in a sum of Rs. 10,000.00 with two solvent sureties. Appellant (Superintendent of Narcotic Control Bureau, South Zonal Unit, Chennai) has filed this appeal by special leave in challenge of the said order of the Madras High Court.

(3) LEARNED Single Judge of the High Court did countenance only two points for adopting the exceptional course of granting bail to an accused involved in the offence under NDPS Act. They are: there was prima fade violation of Section 52 and there was prima fade non-compliance with S











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top