SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1417

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
T. Thomson – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


(1) THE above three appeals arise from one judgment in which three persons stand convicted ultimately for offences under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short the Act) 1985. We will refer to them by the rank in which they were referred in the trial court. A.1-T. Thomson was convicted under Sections 21 and 25 of the Act and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years each under the above counts besides a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs each under both counts. A.2- Bhuvanachandran Nair and A.3 - Madhusoodhan Achari were convicted under Section 21 alone, but sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 20 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2 lakhs each. There was a fourth person arrayed in the trial court by name Jay Kumar. Though he was convicted under the same Section and was convicted with the same sentence he got acquittal from the High Court. So the three convicted persons have filed these appeals by special leave.

(2) PW.1 S.Madanan (the Superintendent of Central Excise, Customs and Intelligence Unit, Trivandrum) conducted a raid on 27, December 1993 in the building which is said to be the residence of first accused - T. Thomson. The







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top