SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1631

D.P.MOHAPATRA, M.B.SHAH
Bal Kishore Mody – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Singh – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) HEARD the learned Counsel for the parties.

(3) THIS appeal is filed against the judgement and order, dated 17.5.1999 passed by the High Court of Patna in contempt proceedings numbered as M.J.C. No.3493/1998. The grievance of the appellant is that despite the fact that the appellant retired on 31.12.1995 and submitted pension papers on 15.1.1996, the appellant was not paid his retiral benefits for years together and for that purpose, he was required to approach the High Court. Despite the High Courts order some officers of the State Government delayed the payment of pensionary benefits. As there was breach of the order passed by the High Court, aforesaid contempt proceedings were initiated and finally by the impugned order, the contempt proceedings were disposed of by the High Court by observing that the authorities shall release the full amount towards pension, gratuity and leave encashment as sanctioned and payment order issued by the Accountant General within three days from the date of the appearance of the appellant before the concerned Treasury Officer. The Court has further observed that in case of non-compliance of the order, it


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top