SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1929

RUMA PAL, A.P.MISRA
Chandgi Ram – Appellant
Versus
University Of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.P.MISRA, J.

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THE appellant has sought for a direction for his continuance in the post of Director, Students Advisory Bureau and the post of Programme Officer. The case of the appellant is that he has been appointed under Section 3(3) of the University Teachers and Officers (Selection for Appointment) Act, 1974 initially for a period of three months. The said appointment was extended on 10/2/1997 for a further period of six months. Thereafter on 5/3/1997 he was also appointed on ad hoc basis under Section 3(3) of the said Act as Programme Officer in the Department of Adult Education for a period of 90 days only. However, on 6/6/1997 the respondent terminated the services of the appellant on the said posts on the ground that his continuance on the same post was contrary to the law and further his period of appointment has already expired. In other words, the submission on behalf of the University is that this appointment was on ad hoc basis which could only be for a short period. The vacancy on the aforesaid post, as per submission for the appellant is since 1995 and till regular appointment is made he should be permitted









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top