SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 1228

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
Priyanka Pandit Fulore – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P.MOHAPATRA, J.

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties.

(3) IN this appeal filed on behalf of the detenu Pandit Kishan Fulore, the judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing criminal writ petition no. 1763 of 2000 is under challenge. In the said writ petition, the order of detention passed by the commissioner of police, Thane, against the detenu under section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 (No. LV of 1981) (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") was challenged.

(4) FROM the discussions in the judgment of the High Court it appears that the detention order was challenged on the grounds that due to the delay in passing the order of detention by the authority the nexus between the activities allegedly committed by the detenu and the necessity for passing the order of preventive detention was lost; that the in-camera statements recorded by the subordinate officials were accepted by the competent authority without verifying the truth or otherwise. The High Court on perusal of the pleadings and on considerati






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top