SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(SC) 250

B.N.AGARWAL, M.B.SHAH
Mohd. Altaf – Appellant
Versus
Public Service Commission – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.B.SHAH, J.

(1) MR. Prag P. Tripathi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no 1- U.P. Public Service Commission (for short the Public Service Commission) submits that in compliance with the order dated 10th January, 2001, Public Service Commission has prepared a list of eligible candidates which is produced before us today in court and is reproduced as under:- "Categories of Petitioners" (A) Lecturer in CBSE/ICSE Boards recognized colleges: 1. Mohd Altaf CA Nos.961-962 of 1999

2. Mahendra Pratap Singh CA Nos.963-966 of 1999

3. Vinod Kumar Sharma CA Nos.965-966 of 1999

4. Dhananjai Dwivedi CA Nos.974-975 of 1999

5. Mohd Iqbal CA Nos.967 of 1998

6. Maheshwar Singh CA Nos.974-975 of 1998

(B) L.T.Grade Teachers/Trained Graduate Teachers: 1. Devendra Swaroop CA No.968 of 1999

2. Virendra Kumar Singh CA No.968 of 1999

3. Onkar Singh CA No.968 of 1999

4. Ram Prakash CA Nos.970-971 of 1999

5. Anoop Saxena CA No.969 of 1999

6. Jamuna Prasad Gangwar CA No.969 of 1999

7. Fateh Chand CA No.3896 of 1999

8. Ram Pal CA Nos.970-971 of 1999

9. Kamal Prakash CA Nos.970-971 of 1999

10. Mahendra Pal SLP No.10048 of 1999

(C) Not validly appointed teac


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top