SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 301

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.N.Variava : H.K.Sema
Ipca Laboratory Ltd.
Versus
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai
Case No. : 1697 of 2003
Date of Decision : 3/11/04
Advocates Appeared: Sohrab E.Dastur : F.V.Irani : Rustom B.Hathikhanawala : Rajiv Tyagi : Tufail A.Khan : B.V.Balram Das

Headnote:

Income-tax Act, 1961, Sections 260 A, 80HHC(3)(c) and 119- Circular No. 241/85 - Deduction of export profits- Deduction claimed under Section 80-HHC for Rs. 3.78 crores- The Assessing Officer, disallowed the deduction of Rs. 3.78 crores holding that there was a net loss from export of goods-The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the Appeal - The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Second Appeal- High Court also dismissed the Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Act- Held if there is a loss then no deduction would be available under Section 80-HHC(1) or (3)(a) or (3)(b). In arriving at the figure of positive profit, both the profits and the losses will have to be considered-If the net figure is a positive profit then the assessee will be entitled to a deduction. If the net figure is a loss then the assessee will not be entitled to a deduction- The appeal dismissed [Paras 11 to 15, 19 and 20]

JUDGMENT

S.N. Variava, J.

1. This Appeal is against a Judgment dated 2nd July, 2001 passed by the Bombay High Court.

2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:

The Appellants are a Export House. They hold a certificate issued by the Chief Controller of Imports and Exports. For the Assessment Year 1996097 the Appellants filed a return of income declaring Nil income. It is an admitted position that the taxable income, before the deductions under Chapter VIA, was Rs. 4.39 crores. However, against this taxable income the Appellants claimed various deductions. One such deduction was under Section 80 HHC for Rs. 3.78 crores. During the assessment proceedings it was found that the Appellants were exporting goods which were self manufactured as well as goods manufactured by supporting manufacturers i.e. trading goods. It was found that the sum of Rs. 3.78 crores, which had been claimed as a deduction, was the profit from exports of self manufactured goods. It was found that from the exports of trading goods there was a loss of Rs. 6.86 crores. It was found that the Appellants had issued certificates of disclaimer in favour of the supporting manufacturers in respect of the entire export of trading goods. The Assessing Officer therefore held that there was a net loss from export of goods and disallowed the deduction of Rs. 3.78 crores. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the Appeal filed by the Appellants on 11th October, 1999. On 29th December, 2000 the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Second Appeal. By the impugned Judgment the Bombay High Court has dismissed the Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act.

3. The question for consideration is whether the Appellants are entitled to deduction under Section 80HHC in respect of the sum of Rs. 3.78 crores by ignoring the loss of Rs. 6.86 crores. It therefore becomes necessary to look at Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act. The relevant portions of Section 80HHC reads as follows:

"80HHC. Deduction In Respect of Profits Retained for Export Business. (1) Where an assessee, being an Indian company or a person (other than a company) resident in India, is engaged in the business of export out of India of any goods or merchandise to which this section applies, there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed, in computing the total income of the assessee, [a deduction to the extent of profits, referred to in sub-section (1B)] derived by the assessee from the export of such goods or merchandise:

Provided that if the assessee, being a holder of an Export House Certificate or a Trading House Certificate (hereafter in this section referred to as an Export House or a Trading House, as the case may be,) issues a certificate referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (4A), that in respect of the amount of the export turnover specified therein, the deduction under this sub-section is to be allowed to a supporting manufacturer, then the amount of of deduction in the case of the assessee shall be reduced by such amount which bears to the [total profits derived by the assessee from the export of trading goods, the same proportion as the amount of export turnover specified in the said certificate bears to the total export turnover of the assessee in respect of such trading goods.]

(1A) Where the assessee, being a supporting manufacturer, has during the previous year, sold goods or merchandise to any Export House or Trading House in respect of which the Export House or trading House has issued a certificate under the proviso to sub-section (1), there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed in computing the total income of the assessee, [a deduction to the extent of profits, referred to in sub-section (1B)],-derived by the assessee from the sale of goods or merchandise to the Export House or Trading House in respect of which the certificate has been issued by the Export House or Trading House.

xxx xxx xxx

xxx xxx x

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top