SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1084

S.N.VARIAVA, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Impression Prints – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Delhi-1 – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.N. VARIAVA, J.

This Appeal is against the Judgment dated 27th December, 1999 by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short CEGAT), New Delhi.

2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:

The Appellants are manufacturers, amongst others, of items like bed sheets, bed covers and pillow cases. In this Appeal, we are concerned with the question as to whether the Appellants are entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 65/87-CE dated 1st March, 1987 in respect of bed sheets, bed covers and pillow cases. These items fall under Tariff Item 6301 which consists of "made up textile articles". Under the Notification, these articles have a "Nil" rate of duty "if made without the aid of power". The Appellants had not taken out any license and were not paying duty. They were issued a show-cause- notice as to why duty be not levied on these items and why penalty be not imposed. The Appellants claimed that under the abovementioned Notification these items bore a "Nil" rate of duty and that they were therefore not liable to pay duty. Their case was not accepted on the ground that in the process of manufacturing printed bed sheets, bed covers and pillow cases they m










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top