SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 197

B.N.KIRPAL, SUHAS C.SEN
West Coast Paper Mills – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, Belgaum – Respondent


(1) IT is the case of the appellant that the appellant was guided by the trade notice issued by the Poona Collectorate and did not, therefore, apply for relief under Rule 56-A(i) as it stood at the material time. That is the reason why the appellant did not claim any benefit of relief about payment of duty on the intermediate product. This point was not taken before the tribunal and the tribunal had no occasion to examine it. A similar question came up before this court in the case of Formica India Division v. CCE and this court was of the view that the assessee should be allowed to raise this point before the appropriate authority. In view of this decision, we remit the case back to the Assistant Commissioner of central Excise. The assessee will be at liberty to apply in accordance with law for necessary relief and the Assistant Commissioner is directed to examine the facts and decide the case in accordance with law.

(2) THE appeal is accordingly disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top