SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 312

S.SAGHIR AHMAD, K.RAMASWAMY
Kameshwari Devi Alias Kaleshwari Devi – Appellant
Versus
Barhani – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Patna High Court, made on 25-2-1986 in appeal from Appellate Decree No. 17 of 1977.

2. The admitted facts are that one Hulash Kumhar, the common ancestor had two sons, Jitram Kumhar and Gudar Kumhar. The appellants represent the branch of Jitram Kumhar and the respondent represented the branch of Gudar Kumhar. Bigan was the father of the appellant and his mother was Anandi Kauri. Bigan died in 1957 leaving behind him the original plaintiff, Arujun Mahato and his sisters, Defendants 8-11 and brothers Defendants 13 and 14. One Bajani Kumari, Defendant 1 in the present suit, representing the branch of Gudar Kumhar, filed Suit No. 178 of 1957 for partition impleading Bigan and five others. The suit for partition was filed on 20-9-1957 and Bigan died before summons were served on him on 27-9-1957. Subsequently, his widow, Anandi Kauri was brought on record as Defendant 1. The appellant was impleaded therein as 4th defendant. Summons, ultimately, were taken to his mother as natural guardian. Since she refused to receive the notice, an application was taken out to appoint a court guardian, which accordingly came to be o




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top