SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1550

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B P Jeevan Reddy, Suhas C Sen
INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS
VERSUS
SRIRAM BEARINGS LTD. AND OTHERS, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeals No. 2350 of 1986 with No. 6943 of 1995, decided on September 26, 1996.

Important Points

Consideration for the sale of trade secrets stipulated in an agreement is taxable based on the place where it is earned.

Subject

Taxation Law - International Taxation

Headnote

Taxability - Sale of Trade Secrets - The court held that the consideration for the sale of trade secrets stipulated in a two-part agreement was not earned in India and therefore not taxable.

Fact of the Case:

The court considered the taxability of the consideration for the sale of trade secrets stipulated in a two-part agreement between the respondent and M/s. Nippon Seike Kabushiki Kaisha (NSK).

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the consideration for the sale of trade secrets was not earned in India and therefore not taxable.

Issues: The main issue was the taxability of the consideration for the sale of trade secrets stipulated in the agreement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court analyzed the agreement and concluded that the consideration for the sale of trade secrets was stipulated to be earned in Japan, and therefore not taxable in India.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed with no costs.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • tax law
    • income tax
      • international taxation
        • taxability of foreign income (Para 2)

Table of Contents

1. Dispute over the taxability of consideration received for the sale of trade secrets under an agreement also providing for technical assistance. (Para 2 )

2. Whether consideration for the sale of trade secrets, stipulated as being effected in a foreign country, is taxable as income earned in India. (Para 2 )

3. The agreement separates consideration for technical assistance from the sale of trade secrets; the latter was effected in Japan and not earned in India. (Para 2 )

4. Consideration for the sale of trade secrets effected in a foreign country is not taxable as income earned in India. (Para 2 )

5. Appeals dismissed. (Para 3 , 4 )

6. When is consideration for the sale of trade secrets not taxable as income earned in India?

Consideration for the sale of trade secrets is not taxable as income earned in India when the agreement specifically stipulates that the sale is effected in a foreign country. (Para 2 )

ORDER

Civil Appeal No. 2350 of 1986

1. We have heard the counsel for the appellant and respondent.

2. We are not prepared to agree that the High Court has not correctly understood the purport of the agreement between the respondent and M/s. Nippon Seike Kabushiki Kaisha (NSK). The agreement is in two parts. It is true that the two parts are interdependent but yet the consideration for the sale of trade secrets and consideration of technical assistance is separately provided for and mentioned under separate sections. So far as the consideration for the technical assistance is concerned, its taxability is not in doubt. The only controversy is with respect to the taxability of 1,65,000 US Dollars which is stipulated as the consideration for sale of trade secrets. The agreement specifically says that the said sale is effected in Japan. We are unable to see on what basis it can be said that any part of the said amount has been earned in India.

3. The appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Civil Appeal No. 6943 of 1995

4. For the reasons given in Civil Appeal No. 2350 of 1986, this appeal is also dismissed. No costs.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top