SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1827

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B L Hansaria, G N Ray
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, WEST BENGAL AND ANOTHER, APPELLANT
VERSUS
DELTA JUTE AND INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANOTHER, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeal No. 14167 of 1996 (Arising out of SLP No. 859 of 1995), decided on November 1, 1996.

The interpretation of Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, in the context of a special case where the revival of a sick industry was at stake.

Headnote:

Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Consent Order - Interpretation of Section 14-B

Fact of the Case:

The trial Judge passed an order for making payment of arrear dues in instalments with a direction that no interest or damages should be charged, considering the provisions of Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that in the special facts of the case, it was not desirable to direct for payment of interest and damages as claimed, as the respondent Company had revived and paid both the current and arrear dues of provident fund contribution in instalments without any default.

Issues: Interpretation of Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and whether the impugned order should be interfered with.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court considered the provisions of Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and the special facts of the case, and decided not to interfere with the impugned order.

Final Decision: The appeal was accordingly disposed of without any order as to costs.

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Although it appears to us that the order passed by the learned trial Judge was not couched in such a manner for which it can be inferred that it is a consent order, but it appears to us that after considering the facts and circumstances of the case and presumably after keeping in view the provision of Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, the learned trial Judge passed the order for making payment of arrear dues in instalments with a direction that no interest or damages should be charged.

4. In the facts of the case and also considering the fact that after a scheme was prepared by this Court, the respondent Company, which was a sick industry, has revived and has paid both the current and arrear dues of provident fund contribution in instalments without any default. In the special facts of the case, it will not be desirable to direct for payment of interest and damages as claimed so that the process of revival is again put to jeopardy. Considering the provisions of Section 14-B of the said Act and also the facts of the case, we do not intend to interfere with the impugned order. This appeal is accordingly disposed of without any order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top